Ancient DNA from Tianyuan Cave
Another new
PNAS paper that hasn't yet appeared in the journal website. Still, from this description at ScienceNews this appears to be
Very Important, as it pertains to a 40,000-year-old modern human, which, if I'm not mistaken is the oldest modern human tested so far:
Ancient DNA from cell nuclei and maternally inherited mitochondria
indicates that this individual belonged to a population that eventually
gave rise to many present-day Asians and Native Americans, says a team
led by Qiaomei Fu and Svante Paabo, evolutionary geneticists at the Max
Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.
The partial skeleton, unearthed in Tianyuan Cave near Beijing in 2003,
carries roughly the same small proportions of Neandertal and Denisovan
genes as living Asians do (SN: 8/25/12, p. 22), the scientists report
online January 21 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences.
The Max Planck press release adds some
information:
The genetic profile reveals that this early modern human was related
to the ancestors of many present-day Asians and Native Americans but had
already diverged genetically from the ancestors of present-day
Europeans.
This is an important finding because some published demographic models
had Europeans and East Eurasians diverging as recently as ~20 thousand
years ago. It now appears that they did so already at around the time of
the Upper Paleolithic revolution, when unambiguous evidence of modern
humans across Eurasia exists.
UPDATE I: While we wait for this paper to appear on the
PNAS website,
it might be useful to wonder whether the Tianyuan sample might fall on
the East Asian/Amerindian group or the more general "Ancestral South
Indian" (ASI)/East Eurasian group.
According to
current dating,
haplogroup M itself is ~50 thousand years old, and most of the
subclades therein coalesce to younger than 40ky times. It's possible
that the Tianyuan sample dates from a period where ASI/East Asian
differentiation had only just begun or was just about to begin.
The press release makes clear that Tianyuan was already "Asian" rather
than generalized Eurasian, proving that East/West Eurasian
differentiation had begun by ~40kya. It will be interesting to see
whether it can be placed on a more specific "East Eurasian" group rather
than a generalized "Asian" one.
UPDATE II: The paper is now online.
UPDATE III: From the paper:
Thus, it is related to the mtDNA that was ancestral to present-day
haplogroup B (Fig. 1), which has been estimated to be around 50,000 y
old (18) (50. 7 ka BP; 95% CI: 38.1–68.3 ka BP). We note that the age of
the Tianyuan individual is compatible with this date.
So, it appears to be within macro-haplogroup N, with
haplogroup B
being, I think, a fairly unambiguously East Asian/Native American clade
of the phylogeny. It will certainly be interesting to see how the much
more successful -and younger- M subclades ended up dominating East
Eurasia.
UPDATE IV: The TreeMix analysis clearly places Tianyuan within
the Asian group, but does not resolve whether Papuans are an outgroup to
East Asians/Tianyuan:
I guess that is expected (see my UPDATE I), since Tianyuan dates from a
period where within-Asia differentiation had only just begun or was
about to begin.
UPDATE V: With respect to sharing of alleles with archaic Eurasian hominins, the Tianyuan sample is within the modern range of variation.
PNAS doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221359110
DNA analysis of an early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, China
Qiaomei Fu et al.
Hominins with morphology similar to present-day humans appear in the
fossil record across Eurasia between 40,000 and 50,000 y ago. The
genetic relationships between these early modern humans and present-day
human populations have not been established. We have extracted DNA from a
40,000-y-old anatomically modern human from Tianyuan Cave outside
Beijing, China. Using a highly scalable hybridization enrichment
strategy, we determined the DNA sequences of the mitochondrial genome,
the entire nonrepetitive portion of chromosome 21 (~30 Mbp), and over
3,000 polymorphic sites across the nuclear genome of this individual.
The
nuclear DNA sequences determined from this early modern human reveal
that the Tianyuan individual derived from a population that was
ancestral to many present-day Asians and Native Americans but postdated
the divergence of Asians from Europeans. They also show that this
individual carried proportions of DNA variants derived from archaic
humans similar to present-day people in mainland Asia.
Link